top of page
Lambrianakos-Peter.jpg
OurTeam_Grey@4x.png
OurTeam@4x.png

Peter Lambrianakos

Partner

New York

T: 646-797-4353

F: 212-257-5796

plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com

Intellectual Property

Litigation Finance

IP Litigation

Peter Lambrianakos is a trial lawyer whose practice focuses on patent infringement litigation in federal courts, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and the International Trade Commission. Peter's patent infringement experience includes litigating cases involving a wide range of technologies and products, such as semiconductors, smartphones, software, acoustics, mobile payments, LED displays, and wireless communications. He has participated in all aspects of litigation from pre-filing diligence through appeal, including district court trials, oral hearings in the PTAB, and appeals before the Federal Circuit. Peter has also represented patent owners and petitioners in over 250 inter partes review and covered business method review proceedings in the PTAB. He has assisted his clients in obtaining litigation funding for patent infringement cases and PTAB proceedings. 

Representation

  • Represents an audio/video integration system company in its claims of patent infringement against several automotive manufacturers. Defended the validity of the patents against over a dozen IPR petitions.

 

  • Represents an LED display manufacturer in ITC and district court proceedings concerning infringement of patents covering modular LED display panels.

 

  • Represents a patent owner in its claims of infringement of five patents involving semiconductor technology. Defended the validity of the patents against several IPR petitions and obtained favorable settlements. 

 

  • Represents an app developer in a patent infringement case against several smartphone companies.

  • Defended a manufacturer of optical fiber testing equipment against patent infringement claims concerning OTDR equipment. Challenged the validity of the asserted patents in two IPR petitions and obtained a favorable settlement a short time later. 

  • Represented a semiconductor company in its claims of infringement of near field communications patents.

 

  • Defended an online software company in four related litigations in which multiple products were accused of infringing eight patents concerning location tracking systems, carrier billing and Internet telephony. 

  • Defended an online software company against patent infringement claims concerning its Internet telephony product Obtained a favorable settlement after claim construction. 

  • Represented a semiconductor manufacturer in its claims of infringement of flash memory patents.

  • Represented a steel manufacturer in its claims for declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity of a patent on a process for manufacturing steel sheet piles. 

  • Represented a steel manufacturer in its claims for declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity of two utility patents and three design patents covering steel sheet pile connectors. 

  • Represented multiple defendants in connection with claims that a user-feedback web site infringed six patents. Obtained a favorable settlement during discovery. 

  • Defended against claims that notebook computers infringed four patents covering thermal and power management of computers. 

 

  • Represented a defendant in connection with claims that its notebook computers infringed two patents concerning wireless communications. Obtained a favorable settlement after claim construction. 

 

  • Defended against claims that mobile devices infringed patents covering navigation systems. Obtained a favorable settlement before claim construction Defended against claims that an enclosed belt conveyor infringed a patent.

 

  • Successfully put the asserted patent into ex parte reexamination and obtained a stay of the litigation and a final rejection of all asserted claims. Represented a plaintiff in its claims for declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity of numerous patents covering digital watermarking. Obtained a favorable settlement. 

 

  • Defended against claims that an automated pharmacy infringed two patents. Obtained a judgment of non-­infringement after a jury trial that was affirmed on appeal. 

 

  • Represented a defendant in connection with infringement claims against its e-commerce web site. Obtained a transfer of the claims against the defendant from the Eastern District of Texas to the Northern District of California.

 

Publications

  • Co-Author, "Mandamus as a strategic tool to avoid a forum" Intellectual Property Magazine, January 21, 2019

  • Co-author, "Demonstrating a Technological Invention to Defeat CBM Review: Intellectual Property Today, March 2015

Professional Memberships

  • New York State Bar Association

  • New York Intellectual Property Law Association

Fordham University - J.D. 1996

University of Pennsylvania

B.S.E. Computer Science and Engineering - 1993

Bar Admissions

  • New York

  • New Jersey

  • US Patent & Trademark Office

  • US Court of Appeals, Federal, Second and Third Circuits

  • US District Courts: Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, District of New Jersey, Eastern District of Texas

Fordham Law.jpg

Education

Upenn.png
bottom of page